Which weight loss diets work best? 4 popular diets compared

> Why Become a Member
> Become a Subscriber Member
> Become a Megabyte Member

> Fact Sheets
> Food Composition Tables
> FAQ's

> Food Facts
> Food Questions & Answers
> Patient Problems in Clinical Nutrition
> PhDs

> Subscribe to Journal
> Subscribe to Society
> Current Issues - Abstracts
       > Login to Full Papers
> Past Issues
> Nutrition Society of Australia
       > 1976 - 1979
       > 1980 - 1989
       > 1990 - 1999
       > 2000 - Current Date
> Editorial Board
> Author Instructions

> HEC Healthy Eating Pyramid
> HEC Food Variety Score
> HEC Physical Activity Score
> Other

> HEC Brochure (FREE)
> HEC Booklet (FREE)

> Modules on Offer
> How to use the Modules
> Enrol
> Login to Modules

> About WOLP
> Join WOLP
> Login to WOLP

> Store Home
> CD-Rom's
> Books
> PhD Dissertations
> Reports
> Videos
> Course Modules

> Subscribe
> Past Issues

Which weight loss diet works best? 4 popular diets compared

A study conducted by Dansinger et al., published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 2005
(vol 293, no.1 Jan 5) compared adherence rates and the effectiveness of 4 popular diets (Atkins, Zone, Weight Watchers, and Ornish) for weight loss and cardiac risk factor reduction. 160 overweight/obese people aged 22-72 years (average age 50) were randomly assigned to one of the diets (i.e 40 subjects per diet).

The primary outcome of weight loss at 1 year was modest (about 5 kg for those who stuck to any of the diets) and there was no difference between the low carbohydrate high fat approach of Atkins, the high protein low glycaemic load approach of the Zone diet, the very low fat diet approach of Ornish and the low calorie portion size approach of weight watchers.

Adherence rates were poor for all 4 diets, especially for the more extreme Atkins and the Ornish diets; 42% of all participants were not following their diet after 12 months.

Interestingly, average energy intake was around 2000kcal before subjects were allocated to a diet; energy intake dropped to about 1500kcal on average in the first 6 months and crept up to 1800kcal in the last 6 months for all diets. At 1 year, mean energy reduction from baseline was around 200kcal for all diets.

Once participants were on their diet, the thing the made the biggest difference to weight loss was the amount of exercise they were doing. All participants were encouraged to do at least 60min of exercise per week. Exercise levels increased modestly from baseline throughout the trial and to a similar extent for each diet group.

Heart risk factor benefits were similar for all 4 diets i.e each diet significantly reduced LDL (bad) cholesterol and increased HDL (good) cholesterol (except the Ornish diet) to the same degree with no significant effects on triglycerides, blood pressure or fasting blood glucose at 1 year.

HEC commentary: At present, there are no data to help clinicians practicably match a diet to a patient's
"diet response genotype". For example, if you have the genetic make-up to develop diabetes then a low carbohydrate load low glycaemic index diet may be more effective than a high carbohydrate diet.
Furthermore, this study suggests that the macronutrient mix is not so important for weight loss - reducing energy intake by about 200-300kcal per day (easily achieved by reducing indulgences in the diet) and increasing energy expenditure through modest exercise (30min walking daily) should result in modest weight loss after 12 months (about 5kg) or at least weight maintenance. The best diet is to include ample vegetables, fruit, wholegrain cereals, nuts, legumes, reduced fat dairy products, seafood, lean meat and added 'good' fats in moderation.